Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Clinical consequences of nonadherence to Barrett's esophagus surveillance recommendations: a Multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors
  • Roumans, Carlijn A M1, 2
  • van der Bogt, Ruben D1
  • Nieboer, Daan2
  • Steyerberg, Ewout W2, 3
  • Rizopoulos, Dimitris4
  • Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris2
  • Biermann, Katharina5
  • Bruno, Marco J1
  • Spaander, Manon C W1
  • 1 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 3 Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 4 Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 5 Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
Publication Date
Jul 27, 2023
Volume
36
Issue
8
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac113
PMID: 36579763
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Half of Barrett's esophagus (BE) surveillance endoscopies do not adhere to guideline recommendations. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we assessed the clinical consequences of nonadherence to recommended surveillance intervals and biopsy protocol. Data from BE surveillance patients were collected from endoscopy and pathology reports; questionnaires were distributed among endoscopists. We estimated the association between (non)adherence and (i) endoscopic curability of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), (ii) mortality, and (iii) misclassification of histological diagnosis according to a multistate hidden Markov model. Potential explanatory parameters (patient, facility, endoscopist variables) for nonadherence, related to clinical impact, were analyzed. In 726 BE patients, 3802 endoscopies were performed by 167 endoscopists. Adherence to surveillance interval was 16% for non-dysplastic (ND)BE, 55% for low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and 54% of endoscopies followed the Seattle protocol. There was no evidence to support the following statements: longer surveillance intervals or fewer biopsies than recommended affect endoscopic curability of EAC or cause-specific mortality (P > 0.20); insufficient biopsies affect the probability of NDBE (OR 1.0) or LGD (OR 2.3) being misclassified as high-grade dysplasia/EAC (P > 0.05). Better adherence was associated with older patients (OR 1.1), BE segments ≤ 2 cm (OR 8.3), visible abnormalities (OR 1.8, all P ≤ 0.05), endoscopists with a subspecialty (OR 3.2), and endoscopists who deemed histological diagnosis an adequate marker (OR 2.0). Clinical consequences of nonadherence to guidelines appeared to be limited with respect to endoscopic curability of EAC and mortality. This indicates that BE surveillance recommendations should be optimized to minimize the burden of endoscopies. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times