Affordable Access

[Choice of antibacterial drugs in urinary infection].

Authors
Type
Published Article
Journal
Urologii︠a︡ (Moscow, Russia : 1999)
Publication Date
Issue
2
Pages
4–8
Identifiers
PMID: 22876623
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

A rise in efficacy of the treatment of acute infection affecting the lower urinary tract (LUTI) and prolongation of recurrence-free interval in chronic LUTI can be achieved only by an optimal antibacterial treatment. The study was made of 987 community-acquired strains of uropathogens from the patients living in 20 cities of the Russian Federation, Belarus and Kazakhstan (of them, 903 strains were from Russia). Enterobacteriaceae comprised 83.5%. E. coli infection of LUTI was found in 63.5% patients. The incidence of this infection was about the same both in uncomplicated and complicated cases (64.6 and 62.1%, respectively). Most active oral drugs against E.coli were phosphomycin (98.4%), furasidin (95.7%), nitrofurantoin (94.1%) and oralcefalosporins of the third generation (ceftibuten and cefixim). As to Enterobacteriaceae, only phosphomycin had activity against these bacteria above 90%, i.e. 91.5%. Furasidin and nitrofurantoin activity was 86.3 and 76.8%, respectively. From parenteral drugs, most active against E. coli were carbapenems (ertapenem, meropenem, imipenem. Strains resistant to them were not isolated. High in vitro activity was demonstrated also by cefoperason/sulbactam (97.4%), piperacillin/tasobactam (95.7%), cefalosporins of the third/fourth generation and amikacin (98.9%). Carbapenems were also highly active against Enterobacteroaceae. Empiric treatment of uncomplicated urinary infection should be performed with medicines which are not used for other indications.

Statistics

Seen <100 times