Affordable Access

Cerebellar Control on Prefrontal-Motor Connectivity During Movement Inhibition.

Authors
  • Picazio, Silvia1
  • Ponzo, Viviana2
  • Koch, Giacomo2, 3
  • 1 Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, Clinical and Behavioral Neurology Department, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179, Rome, Italy. [email protected] , (Italy)
  • 2 Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, Clinical and Behavioral Neurology Department, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179, Rome, Italy. , (Italy)
  • 3 Stroke Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Policlinic Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy. , (Italy)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Cerebellum (London, England)
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2016
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
680–687
Identifiers
PMID: 26481247
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests a crucial role of right inferior frontal gyrus (r-IFG) and right pre-supplementary motor area (r-preSMA) in movement inhibition control. The present work was aimed to investigate how the effective connectivity between these prefrontal areas and the primary motor cortex could change depending on the activity of the cerebellar cortex. Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered in healthy subjects over the r-IFG/left primary motor area (l-M1) and over r-preSMA/l-M1 before (100 ms after the fixation cross onset) and 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 ms after the presentation of a Go/NoGo visual cue establishing the specific time course and the causal interactions of these regions in relation to l-M1 as measured by motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The same paired-pulse protocol was applied following sham or real cerebellar continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS). Following sham cTBS, for NoGo trials only, MEPs collected showed the expected pattern of activation for both r-IFG-l-M1 and r-preSMA-l-M1 connectivity, characterized by peaks of increased and decreased MEP amplitude regularly repeated every 50 ms. Following cerebellar cTBS, this pattern of activation related to NoGo trials was modified selectively for the r-IFG-M1 but not for r-preSMA-M1 connection. A common monitoring action of r-IFG and r-preSMA in inhibitory control was confirmed. The effects of cerebellar cTBS showed a specific interaction between cerebellum and r-IFG activity during the inhibitory process.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times