Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Cardiovascular responses to rhythmic handgrip exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Authors
  • Ratchford, Stephen M.1, 2,
  • Clifton, Heather L.1, 2
  • La Salle, D. Taylor2
  • Broxterman, Ryan M.1, 2
  • Lee, Joshua F.1, 2
  • Ryan, John J.2
  • Hopkins, Paul N.2
  • Wright, Josephine B.2
  • Trinity, Joel D.1, 2, 2
  • Richardson, Russell S.1, 2, 2
  • Wray, D. Walter1, 2, 2
  • 1 George E. Whalen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • 2 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Publication Date
Sep 17, 2020
Volume
129
Issue
6
Pages
1267–1276
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00468.2020
PMID: 32940557
PMCID: PMC7792839
Source
PubMed Central
Keywords
Disciplines
  • Research Article
License
Unknown

Abstract

Although the contribution of noncardiac complications to the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have been increasingly recognized, disease-related changes in peripheral vascular control remain poorly understood. We utilized small muscle mass handgrip exercise to concomitantly evaluate exercising muscle blood flow and conduit vessel endothelium-dependent vasodilation in individuals with HFpEF ( n = 25) compared with hypertensive controls (HTN) ( n = 25). Heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), brachial artery blood velocity, and brachial artery diameter were assessed during progressive intermittent handgrip (HG) exercise [15–30–45% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)]. Forearm blood flow (FBF) and vascular conductance (FVC) were determined to quantify the peripheral hemodynamic response to HG exercise, and changes in brachial artery diameter were evaluated to assess endothelium-dependent vasodilation. HR, SV, and CO were not different between groups across exercise intensities. However, although FBF was not different between groups at the lowest exercise intensity, FBF was significantly lower (20–40%) in individuals with HFpEF at the two higher exercise intensities (30% MVC: 229 ± 8 versus 274 ± 23 ml/min; 45% MVC: 283 ± 17 versus 399 ± 34 ml/min, HFpEF versus HTN). FVC was not different between groups at 15 and 30% MVC but was ∼20% lower in HFpEF at the highest exercise intensity. Brachial artery diameter increased across exercise intensities in both HFpEF and HTN, with no difference between groups. These findings demonstrate an attenuation in muscle blood flow during exercise in HFpEF in the absence of disease-related changes in central hemodynamics or endothelial function. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The current study identified, for the first time, an attenuation in exercising muscle blood flow during handgrip exercise in individuals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with overweight individuals with hypertension, two of the most common comorbidities associated with HFpEF. These decrements in exercise hyperemia cannot be attributed to disease-related changes in central hemodynamics or endothelial function, providing additional evidence for disease-related vascular dysregulation, which may be a predominant contributor to exercise intolerance in individuals with HFpEF.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times