Affordable Access

Publisher Website

P1: GC-MS or GC-MS/MS for the determination of ethyl glucuronide in hair?

Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-0078(14)70062-9
  • Chemistry


Introduction Ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in hair is currently used as a long-term alcohol marker, and methods with low LOQs are required to differentiate teetotalers from moderate drinkers according to the cut-offs (i.e., 7pg/mg hair). The determination of EtG may be performed by either LC-MS/MS or GC-(MS/)MS. The use of negative ion chemical ionization (NICI) improves the analytical sensitivity of GCMS, whereas similar LOQs were observed for GC-MS and GC-MS/MS (C.L. Crunelle et al., Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;134:1-11). However, the direct comparison of GC-MS and GC-MS/MS in NICI has never been investigated. This study compares GC-MS and GCMS/ MS in NICI mode for EtG determination in hair in order to assess the additional qualitative and quantitative advantages of GCMS/ MS. Methods Hair segments from 64 volunteers (teetotalers, moderate drinkers and excessive drinkers) were analyzed by GC-MS and GCMS/ MS operated in NICI mode on the same instrument. Samples were processed according to I. Kerekes et al. (Ther. Drug Monit. 2013;35:527-529) using a derivatization with heptafluorobutyric anhydride. Results The LOD and LOQ obtained using GC-MS/MS were 0.005pg/mg and 0.017pg/mg respectively, compared to a LOD of 0.022pg/mg and LOQ of 0.075pg/mg with GC-MS. R2 of calibration curves of both methods were above 0.998. Furthermore, lower background noise was observed using GC-MS/MS. The obtained EtG concentrations from the hair samples were similar (mean CV=1.01 %). The differences between both methods were larger for lower EtG concentrations (mean CV=1.67 %) than for higher EtG concentrations (mean CV=0.64 %). This suggests a higher selectivity of GC-MS/MS at lower concentrations. Conclusions By using GC-MS/MS, a higher analytical selectivity and an improved signal to noise ratio, can be achieved. However, using GC-MS/MS instead of GC-MS would not change interpretation of the samples’ EtG concentration regarding the differentiation between teetotalers, moderate drinkers and excessive drinkers.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times