Affordable Access

Electron transfer in rigid and semi-rigid iridium d8-d8 donor-spacer-acceptor complexes

Publication Date
  • Physics


A series of rigid and semi-rigid donor-spacer-acceptor complexes, [Ir(µ-pz*)(CO)(Ph2P-O-C6H4-(CH2)n-py[superscript +]-R)]2(pz* = 3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl; C6H4 = phenylene; py[superscript +] = pyridinium; R = H, 4-tert-butyl, and 4-amide; and n = 0,1,2, and 3, has been synthesized for the purpose of studying photoinduced electron-transfer (ET) reactions. The spacers separating the iridium center (electron donor, Ir2) and pyridinium cation (electron acceptor, py[superscript +]) are based on terminal phosphinite ligands, consisting of a phenylene group and a number of methylene groups ranging from 0 to 3. Three distinct ET reactions can be studied in each complex: singles excited-state electron transfer ([superscript 1]ET), triplet excited-state electron transfer ([superscript 3]ET), and thermal back electron transfer (ET[superscript b]). Atomic positions, obtained from the X-ray crystal structure of [Ir(µ-pz*)(CO)(Ph2P-O-C6H4-CH3]2 were used as a basis for molecular mechanics calculations, furnishing solution structures for the series of Ir2-py[superscript +] donor-acceptor complexes. These results revealed that the spacers in complexes where n = 0 and n =1 are rigid, and that in complexes where n = 2 and n = 3, the spacers are semi-rigid, taking on either folded or stretched conformations in fluid solution. Steady-state and time-resolved emission and absorption experiments were employed to determine [superscript 1]ET, [superscript 3]ET, and ET[superscript b] rates in these complexes. The [superscript 1]ET and [superscript 3]ET rates for the n = 2 and n = 3 complexes exhibit Gaussian free-energy dependence, in excellent agreement with classical ET theory (n = 2: [lambda] = 1.10 eV, H[subscript DA] = 26 cm[superscript -1]; n = 3: [lambda] = 1.05 eV and H[subscript DA] = 7 cm[superscript -1]). However, the [superscript 1]ET and [superscript 3]ET rates in n = 0 and n = 1 complexes exhibit dramatically different behavior: the [superscript 3]ET rates in these rigid complexes are on the order of 10,000 times slower than the corresponding [superscript 1]ET rates. H[subscript DA]s for the ET[superscript b] reactions (n = 1,2) are similar to those of the corresponding [superscript 1]ET reactions. These results are discussed in terms of the solution structure parameters obtained for the series of donor-acceptor complexes. Evidence that through-bond and through-space couplings play different roles in singles and triplet electron transfer is presented for the first time.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.