Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Bone material strength index as measured by impact microindentation in postmenopausal women with distal radius and hip fractures.

Authors
  • Rozental, Tamara D1, 2
  • Walley, Kempland C1
  • Demissie, Serkalem3
  • Caksa, Signe4
  • Martinez-Betancourt, Adriana4
  • Parker, Amber M1
  • Tsai, Joy N4, 5
  • Yu, Elaine W4, 5
  • Bouxsein, Mary L1, 2, 4
  • 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. , (Israel)
  • 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • 3 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA.
  • 4 Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • 5 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Publication Date
Nov 08, 2017
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3338
PMID: 29115684
Source
Medline
Keywords
License
Unknown

Abstract

We tested whether cortical bone tissue properties assessed by in vivo impact microindentation would distinguish postmenopausal women with recent distal radius (DRF) or hip fracture (HF) from non-fracture controls (CONT). We enrolled postmenopausal women with recent DRF (n=57), HF (n=41) or CONT (n=93), and used impact microindentation to assess bone material strength index (BMSi) at the anterior surface of the mid-tibia diaphysis. Areal BMD (g/cm2 ) of the femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH) and lumbar spine (LS) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). HF and DRF subjects had significantly lower BMD than CONT at all sites (-5.6 to -8.2%, p<0.001 for all). BMSi was 4% lower in DRF compared to CONT (74.36 ± 8.77 vs. 77.41 ± 8.79, p=0.04). BMSi was similarly lower in HF versus CONT, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (74.62 ± 8.47 vs. 77.41 ± 8.79, p=0.09). Lower BMSi was associated with increased risk of DRF (unadjusted OR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.02-2.00, per SD decrease, p=0.04), and remained statistically significant after adjustment for age; age and BMI; and age, BMI and FN BMD (OR = 1.48 to 1.55). Lower BMSi tended to be associated with HF, but only reached borderline significance (unadjusted OR=1.39; 95% CI: 0.96-2.01, p=0.08). These results provide strong rationale for future investigations aimed at assessing whether BMSi can predict fracture in prospective studies and improve identification of women at risk for fragility fractures. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times