Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs under cyclic loading in four-point bending in a fracture gap model: two screws versus three screws per fragment

Authors
  • Palierne, Sophie
  • Froidefond, Baptiste
  • Swider, Pascal
  • Autefage, André
Publication Date
Jan 15, 2019
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676335
OAI: oai:HAL:hal-02135089v1
Source
HAL
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown
External links

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The number of locking screws required per fragment during bridging osteosynthesis has not been fully determined in the dog. The purpose of this study was to assess the survival of two constructs, with either two or three screws per fragment, under cyclic bending. METHODS: A 10-hole, 3.5-mm stainless steel locking compression plate was fixed 1 mm away from a bone surrogate in which the fracture gap was 47 mm. Two groups of 10 constructs, prepared with either two or three bicortical locking screws placed at the extremities of each fragment, were tested in a load-controlled 4-point bending test (range 0.7 to + 7 Nm) until failure. RESULTS: The 3-screw constructs were stiffer than the 2-screw constructs (19.73 ± 0.68 N/mm vs. 15.52 ± 0.51 N/mm respectively) and the interfragmentary relative displacements were higher for the 2-screw constructs (11.17 ± 0.88%) than for the 3-screw constructs (8.00 ± 0.45%). The difference between the number of cycles to failure for the 3-screw constructs (162,448 ± 30,073 cycles) and the 2-screw constructs (143,786 ± 10,103 cycles) was not significant. Failure in all constructs was due to plate fracture at the level of the compression holes. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Omission of the third innermost locking screw during bridging osteosynthesis subjected to bending forces led to a 20% reduction in construct stiffness and increased relative displacement (+39.6%) but did not change fatigue life.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times