Affordable Access

Hare on Possible People

Authors
Journal
Journal of Applied Philosophy
0264-3758
Publisher
Wiley Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing)
Publication Date

Abstract

R. M. Hare claims that we have duties to take the preferences of possible people into consideration in moral thinking and that it can harm a merely possible person to have been denied existence. This essay has three parts. First, I attempt to show how Hare's universalizability argument for our obligations to possible people may fail to challenge the consistent proponent of the actuality restriction on moral consideration, regardless of whether this proponent is construed as an amoralist or a fanatic. Second, I raise some objections to Hare's claim that a merely possible person can be harmed. Even if Hare could successfully overcome the objection that a possible person cannot be the recipient of harm, he would still need to show that this harm is morally significant. Third, whether or not Hare is able to answer these objections, I indicate how his moral theory still supports his general position on possible people — namely, that we are ceteris paribus morally bound to bring happy people (and avoid bringing miserable people) into existence.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Possible people.

on Bioethics October 1988

TOM HARE.

on The Lancet Apr 04, 1959

TOM HARE.

on BMJ Mar 28, 1959

[Possible mechanism of superfetation in the doe ha...

on Comptes rendus hebdomadaires d... May 08, 1972
More articles like this..