Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Immunophenotyping in BK Virus Allograft Nephropathy Distinct from Acute Rejection

Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
DOI: 10.1155/2013/412902
  • Clinical Study


Differentiating BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) from acute rejection (AR) is crucial in clinical practice, as both of them have interstitial inflammation in the grafts. The purpose of the study is to describe the inflammatory cellular constituents of BKVN and to determine the clinical utility of immunophenotyping findings in distinguishing BKVN from AR. In addition, the expression of the HLA-DR was investigated. Sixty-five renal allograft recipients were included in this study, including 22 cases of BKVN, 31 cases of AR, and 12 cases of stable allograft. Immunostaining for infiltrating lymphocytes showed that the number of CD20 cells (P < 0.001) and the percentages of CD3 (P < 0.001), CD4 (P = 0.004), CD8 (P = 0.005), and CD20 (P = 0.002) cells were all significantly different between BKVN and AR. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in tubule cell HLA-DR expression (P = 0.156). This observation suggests that the number of CD20 cells and the percentages of CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD20 cells in renal biopsies would aid the distinction between BKVN and AR. On the other hand, the presence of HLA-DR upregulation may not only be specific for acute rejection but also be a response to BKVN.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

Immunophenotyping of interstitial infiltrate does...

on Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) February 2009

Foxp3 Staining in BK Virus Allograft Nephropathy a...

on Transplantation Proceedings Jan 01, 2009

Quantitation of viral DNA in renal allograft tissu...

on Transplantation Journal Aug 27, 2002

Obstruction or renal allograft rejection--potentia...

on QJM : monthly journal of the A... July 2008
More articles like this..