Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

A Bayesian nonparametric test of significance chasing biases.

Authors
  • Karabatsos, George1
  • 1 Departments of Educational Psychology, and Mathematics, Statistics, and by courtesy, Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Research synthesis methods
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2018
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
51–61
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1269
PMID: 28985020
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

There is a growing concern that much of the published research literature is distorted by the pursuit of statistically significant results. In a seminal article, Ioannidis and Trikalinos (2007, Clinical Trials) proposed an omnibus (I&T) test for significance chasing (SC) biases. This test compares the observed number of studies that report statistically significant results, against their expected number based on study power, assuming a common effect size across studies. The current article extends this approach by developing a Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) meta-regression model and test of SC bias, which can diagnose bias at the individual study level. This new BNP test is based on a flexible model of the predictive distribution of study power, conditionally on study-level covariates which account for study diversity, including diversity due to heterogeneous effect sizes across studies. A test of SC bias proceeds by comparing each study's significant outcome report indicator against its estimated posterior predictive distribution of study power, conditionally on the study's covariates. The BNP model and SC bias test are illustrated through the analyses of 3 meta-analytic data sets and through a simulation study. Software code for the BNP model and test, and the data sets, are provided as Supporting Information. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times