Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Balancing hospital governance: A systematic review of 15 years of empirical research.

Authors
  • De Regge, Melissa1
  • Eeckloo, Kristof2
  • 1 Strategic Policy Cell, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organisation, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: [email protected] , (Belgium)
  • 2 Strategic Policy Cell, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: [email protected] , (Belgium)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Social science & medicine (1982)
Publication Date
Jul 31, 2020
Volume
262
Pages
113252–113252
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113252
PMID: 32771874
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

It is crucial that we gain a deeper understanding of the features of organizational governance and how they contribute to hospital performance. Health care governance research has traditionally had a strong focus on the size and composition (i.e., the attributes) of the governing bodies, but less attention has been given to the dynamics, processes, and roles. Furthermore, evidence regarding the interconnection between the board and the executive management is lacking. This systematic literature review is thus intended to give a detailed summary of the attributes, the dynamics, and the processes, as well as the roles of governing bodies, by synthesizing the findings of published empirical studies. The framework of Kane et al. (2009) was used to position the results, taking into account external constraints and outputs/performance. Sixty-three studies were included in the systematic review. The majority of these studies deal with attributes (n = 34) and roles (n = 27); the smallest number of studies (n = 11) focus on dynamics and processes. There is a lack of consistency in the research findings on attributes and there is too little research into the dynamics and processes of hospital governance. However, it has been shown that clinical participation on the hospital board and the focus on quality in hospital board roles can have a beneficial effect. The studies do not provide sufficient direction on what best practice for governing hospitals should be. For this reason, we here provide a useful framework for understanding the aspects of governance and their impact on performance in hospitals and compare these with general corporate governance literature. Therefrom we propose avenues for further research. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times