Avian erythroblastosis virus E26: only one (myb) of two cell-derived coding regions is necessary for oncogenicity.

Affordable Access

Avian erythroblastosis virus E26: only one (myb) of two cell-derived coding regions is necessary for oncogenicity.

Publication Date


The oncogene hypothesis postulates that mutated cellular genes, termed proto-onc genes, function as cancer genes because they are related to retroviral onc genes. However, in contrast to retroviral onc genes, mutated proto-onc genes from cancers are not sufficient for carcinogenesis. Therefore, it has been proposed that mutated proto-onc genes depend on other proto-onc genes for carcinogenesis. Since the oncogene of the avian leukemia virus E26 includes coding regions derived from two cellular proto-onc genes, proto-myb and proto-ets, this hybrid gene has been proposed to be a model for two-gene-carcinogenesis. Here we set out to test this proposal. For this purpose myb and ets deletion mutants of cloned E26 provirus were prepared, and the corresponding viruses, produced by transfected primary chicken embryo cells, were tested for leukemogenicity in newborn chickens. It was found that an ets deletion mutant was just as leukemogenic as the wild-type virus and that a myb deletion mutant lacked leukemogenicity completely. To eliminate the possibility that our E26 myb deletion mutant failed to be leukemogenic because it failed to replicate, the virus was titered by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. By this method, E26 from the plasma of infected chickens was first allowed to reverse-transcribe viral RNA to cDNA in vitro, and then the cDNA concentration was determined from the lowest dilution that gave a positive signal after amplification of E26 cDNA by the PCR method. Virus titers of about 10(5) per ml were found for wild type and for myb and ets deletion mutants of E26. It is concluded that the ets region is not essential for carcinogenesis, and E26 derives transforming function from overexpression of its proto-myb coding region via the retroviral promoter. Thus, E26 is a single-hit carcinogen and, like all other oncogenic retroviruses, is not a model for two-gene-carcinogenesis. Viral ets probably reflects a genetic accident that transduced sequences of proto-ets together with proto-myb in generating E26.


Seen <100 times