Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Augmented exercise in hospital improves physical performance and reduces negative post hospitalization events: a randomized controlled trial

  • McCullagh, Ruth1
  • O’Connell, Eimear2
  • O’Meara, Sarah2
  • Dahly, Darren1, 1
  • O’Reilly, Eilis1
  • O’Connor, Kieran2
  • Horgan, N. Frances3
  • Timmons, Suzanne1
  • 1 University College Cork, Cork, Ireland , Cork (Ireland)
  • 2 Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland , Cork (Ireland)
  • 3 Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland , Dublin (Ireland)
Published Article
BMC Geriatrics
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Feb 07, 2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-1436-0
Springer Nature


BackgroundTo measure the effects of an augmented prescribed exercise programme versus usual care, on physical performance, quality of life and healthcare utilisation for frail older medical patients in the acute setting.MethodsThis was a parallel single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Within 2 days of admission, older medical inpatients with an anticipated length of stay ≥3 days, needing assistance/aid to walk, were blindly randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. Until discharge, both groups received twice daily, Monday-to-Friday half-hour assisted exercises, assisted by a staff physiotherapist. The intervention group completed tailored strengthening and balance exercises; the control group performed stretching and relaxation exercises. Length of stay was the primary outcome measure. Blindly assessed secondary measures included readmissions within 3 months, and physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery) and quality of life (EuroQOL-5D-5 L) at discharge and at 3 months. Time-to-event analysis was used to measure differences in length of stay, and regression models were used to measure differences in physical performance, quality of life, adverse events (falls, deaths) and negative events (prolonged hospitalisation, institutionalisation).ResultsOf the 199 patients allocated, 190 patients’ (aged 80 ± 7.5 years) data were analysed. Groups were comparable at baseline. In intention-to-treat analysis, length of stay did not differ between groups (HR 1.09 (95% CI, 0.77–1.56) p = 0.6). Physical performance was better in the intervention group at discharge (difference 0.88 (95% CI, 0.20–1.57) p = 0.01), but lost at follow-up (difference 0.45 (95% CI, − 0.43 – 1.33) p = 0.3). An improvement in quality of life was detected at follow-up in the intervention group (difference 0.28 (95% CI, 0.9–0.47) p = 0.004). Overall, fewer negative events occurred in the intervention group (OR 0.46 (95% CI 0.23–0.92) p = 0.03).ConclusionImprovements in physical performance, quality of life and fewer negative events suggest that this intervention is of value to frail medical inpatients. Its effect on length of stay remains unclear.Trial Identifier: NCT02463864, registered prospectively 26.05.2015.

Report this publication


Seen <100 times