Affordable Access

Publisher Website

AI-enabled cardiac chambers volumetry in coronary artery calcium scans (AI-CACTM) predicts heart failure and outperforms NT-proBNP: The multi-ethnic study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors
  • Naghavi, Morteza1
  • Reeves, Anthony2
  • Budoff, Matthew3
  • Li, Dong3
  • Atlas, Kyle4
  • Zhang, Chenyu4
  • Atlas, Thomas5
  • Roy, Sion K3
  • Henschke, Claudia I6
  • Wong, Nathan D7
  • Defilippi, Christopher8
  • Levy, Daniel9
  • Yankelevitz, David F6
  • 1 HeartLung.AI, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 2 Department of Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • 3 The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, CA, USA.
  • 4 HeartLung.AI, Houston, TX, USA.
  • 5 Tustin Teleradiology, Tustin, CA, USA.
  • 6 Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • 7 Heart Disease Prevention Program, Division of Cardiology, University of California Irvine, CA, USA.
  • 8 Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA.
  • 9 National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
Publication Date
Apr 24, 2024
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.04.006
PMID: 38664073
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scans contain useful information beyond the Agatston CAC score that is not currently reported. We recently reported that artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled cardiac chambers volumetry in CAC scans (AI-CAC™) predicted incident atrial fibrillation in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). In this study, we investigated the performance of AI-CAC cardiac chambers for prediction of incident heart failure (HF). We applied AI-CAC to 5750 CAC scans of asymptomatic individuals (52% female, White 40%, Black 26%, Hispanic 22% Chinese 12%) free of known cardiovascular disease at the MESA baseline examination (2000-2002). We used the 15-year outcomes data and compared the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of AI-CAC volumetry versus NT-proBNP, Agatston score, and 9 known clinical risk factors (age, gender, diabetes, current smoking, hypertension medication, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LDL, HDL for predicting incident HF over 15 years. Over 15 years of follow-up, 256 HF events accrued. The time-dependent AUC [95% CI] at 15 years for predicting HF with AI-CAC all chambers volumetry (0.86 [0.82,0.91]) was significantly higher than NT-proBNP (0.74 [0.69, 0.77]) and Agatston score (0.71 [0.68, 0.78]) (p ​< ​0.0001), and comparable to clinical risk factors (0.85, p ​= ​0.4141). Category-free Net Reclassification Index (NRI) [95% CI] adding AI-CAC LV significantly improved on clinical risk factors (0.32 [0.16,0.41]), NT-proBNP (0.46 [0.33,0.58]), and Agatston score (0.71 [0.57,0.81]) for HF prediction at 15 years (p ​< ​0.0001). AI-CAC volumetry significantly outperformed NT-proBNP and the Agatston CAC score, and significantly improved the AUC and category-free NRI of clinical risk factors for incident HF prediction. Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times