Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Balloon Angioplasty as the Primary Treatment for Failing Infra-inguinal Vein Grafts

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Publication Date
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.018
  • Vein Graft
  • Stenosis
  • Angioplasty
  • Surveillance
  • Medicine


Abstract Background We sought to evaluate the role of balloon angioplasty as the primary modality in the management of vein graft stenoses. Methods Patients who underwent infrainguinal vein graft bypass from January 2002 to December 2007 were enrolled into a surveillance program. Grafts which developed critical stenoses were identified and underwent urgent angiography with a view to angioplasty of the stenotic lesion. Lesions which were deemed unsuitable for angioplasty underwent urgent surgical repair. Results Four hundred and eleven grafts were followed up for a median of 19 months (range: 2–61). Ninety-six grafts (22.6%) developed critical stenosis. Twelve grafts occluded prior to repair and one was not intervened upon electively. Eight grafts underwent primary surgical repair. Seventy-six grafts underwent 99 endovascular procedures. Technical success was achieved in 60 grafts (78.9%). Of the grafts in which technical success had not been achieved, eight underwent repeat angioplasty and three were surgically repaired. Twenty-four grafts underwent repeat angioplasty for re-stenosis with a technical success rate of 71%. No difference was observed in graft patency ( P = 0.08) or amputation rates ( P = 0.32) between the grafts requiring intervention to maintain patency, and grafts which did not. Smoking [OR: 2.61 (95% CI: 1.51–4.53), ( P = 0.006)], diabetes [OR: 2.55 (95% CI: 1.49–4.35), ( P = 0.006)], renal failure [OR: 1.89 (95% CI: 1.19–3.38), ( P = 0.040)] and recurrent stenosis [OR: 3.22 (95% CI: 1.63–4.69), ( P < 0.001)] were risk factors for graft occlusion. Conclusions Balloon angioplasty of failing infrainguinal vein bypass grafts is safe and can be performed with an acceptable medium term patency rate, albeit with a significant risk of re-stenosis which can be successfully treated in most patients using repeat endovascular intervention.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

Cutting balloon angioplasty versus standard balloo...

on CardioVascular and Interventio... 2007

Balloon angioplasty as a treatment of failing infr...

on Journal of Vascular Surgery Jan 01, 2004

Balloon angioplasty as a treatment of failing infr...

on Journal of Vascular Surgery February 2004

Is Balloon Angioplasty Indicated for “Short” Steno...

on Annals of Vascular Surgery Jan 01, 1998
More articles like this..