Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.

Authors
  • Danneman, Daniela1
  • Drevin, Linda2
  • Delahunt, Brett3
  • Samaratunga, Hemamali4, 5
  • Robinson, David6
  • Bratt, Ola7, 8
  • Loeb, Stacy9
  • Stattin, Pär10, 11
  • Egevad, Lars1, 12
  • 1 Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. , (Sweden)
  • 2 Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. , (Sweden)
  • 3 Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. , (New Zealand)
  • 4 Aquesta Pathology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 5 The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 6 Department of Urology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden. , (Sweden)
  • 7 Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
  • 8 Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. , (Sweden)
  • 9 Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA.
  • 10 Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. , (Sweden)
  • 11 Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Umeå, Sweden. , (Sweden)
  • 12 Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. , (Sweden)
Type
Published Article
Journal
British Journal of Urology
Publisher
Wiley (Blackwell Publishing)
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2017
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
50–56
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13458
PMID: 26918298
Source
Medline
Keywords
License
Unknown

Abstract

Agreement between biopsy and RP Gleason score improved from 2000 to 2012, with most of the improvement occurring before the 2005 ISUP grading revision. Had ISUP grades been used instead of Gleason score, the agreement between biopsy and RP grade would have decreased, probably because of its separation of Gleason score 7 into ISUP grades 2 and 3 (Gleason score 3 + 4 vs 4 + 3).

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times