Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Accuracy of automatic deformable structure propagation for high-field MRI guided prostate radiotherapy

Authors
  • Christiansen, Rasmus Lübeck1, 2
  • Dysager, Lars3
  • Bertelsen, Anders Smedegaard2
  • Hansen, Olfred1, 3
  • Brink, Carsten1, 2
  • Bernchou, Uffe1, 2
  • 1 University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19 3. Sal, Odense C, 5000, Denmark , Odense C (Denmark)
  • 2 Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, Indgang 85, Pavillion, Stuen, Odense C, 5000, Denmark , Odense C (Denmark)
  • 3 Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19 Indgang 85 Pavillion, 1. sal, Odense C, 5000, Denmark , Odense C (Denmark)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Radiation Oncology
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Feb 07, 2020
Volume
15
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-1482-y
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundIn this study we have evaluated the accuracy of automatic, deformable structure propagation from planning CT and MR scans for daily online plan adaptation for MR linac (MRL) treatment, which is an important element to minimize re-planning time and reduce the risk of misrepresenting the target due to this time pressure.MethodsFor 12 high-risk prostate cancer patients treated to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, target structures and organs at risk were delineated on both planning MR and CT scans and propagated using deformable registration to three T2 weighted MR scans acquired during the treatment course. Generated structures were evaluated against manual delineations on the repeated scans using intra-observer variation obtained on the planning MR as ground truth.ResultsMR-to-MR propagated structures had significant less median surface distance and larger Dice similarity index compared to CT-MR propagation. The MR-MR propagation uncertainty was similar in magnitude to the intra-observer variation. Visual inspection of the deformed structures revealed that small anatomical differences between organs in source and destination image sets were generally well accounted for while large differences were not.ConclusionBoth CT and MR based propagations require manual editing, but the current results show that MR-to-MR propagated structures require fewer corrections for high risk prostate cancer patients treated at a high-field MRL.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times