Electronic cell counting to measure total cell numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Affordable Access

Electronic cell counting to measure total cell numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

  • In This Study
  • However
  • Cell Counting Of Bronchoalveolar Lavage (Bal) Fluid Is Performed Manually In Routine Practice
  • This Has Both Methodological And Inherent Errors
  • The Accuracy And Suitability Of Automated Counting Devices Have Been Questioned
  • A Coulter(R) Counter D Industrial Model Was Calibrated And Then Used To Measure The Total Cell Count
  • And Compared To A Standard Manual Method


Eur Respir J, 1994, 7, 1527–1531 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.94.07081527 Printed in UK - all rights reserved Copyright ERS Journals Ltd 1994 European Respiratory Journal ISSN 0903 - 1936 EElleeccttrroonniicc cceellll ccoouunnttiinngg ttoo mmeeaassuurree ttoottaall cceellll nnuummbbeerrss iinn bbrroonncchhooaallvveeoollaarr llaavvaaggee fflluuiidd L.G. Heaney*†, J. McKirgan**, C.F. Stanford*, M. Ennis†, Electronic cell counting to measure total cell numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. L.G. Heaney, J. McKirgan, C.F. Stanford, M. Ennis. ERS Journals Ltd 1994. ABSTRACT: Cell counting of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is performed manually in routine practice. This has both methodological and inherent errors; however, the accuracy and suitability of automated counting devices have been questioned. In this study, a Coulter® Counter D Industrial model was calibrated and then used to measure the total cell count in unprocessed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and compared to a standard manual method. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed on 34 patients undergoing routine bron- choscopy. An aliquot of unprocessed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was taken for all counting procedures. Manual counts were performed blind by two experienced independent observers using improved Neubauer chambers. Electronic counting measured 1 ml aliquots suspended in 10 and 20 ml Isoton® counting 0.5 and 1 ml duplicates. The correlation coefficients between electronic and manual counts were good. The coefficients of repeatability of electronic counts, for repeat counts, both on the same dilution (Intra-Coulter®: 0.1×105 cells·ml-1) and different dilutions (Interdilution- Coulter®: 0.48×105 cells·ml-1), were superior compared to those for repeat manual counts by the same observer (1.03×105 cells·ml-1), and counts between observers (1.82×105 cells·ml-1). This method offers a quick, precise and simple method for counting cells in unprocessed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, which is both less labour intensiv

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.