Affordable Access

Publisher Website

CO2Removal from Power Plant Flue Gas-Cost Efficient Design and Integration Study-Chapter 5

Elsevier Ltd
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044570-0/50090-8
  • Design
  • Engineering


Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on the evaluation of various engineering options to reduce the costs of amine-based carbon dioxide (CO2) capture from flue gas generated by a 400 MW natural gas fired combined cycle (NGCC) power plant. The objective of this study is to cut the cost of a post-combustion amine-based CO2 capture process by 50-70%. Results from this study indicate that capital investment for post-combustion CO2 recovery from gas turbine (GT) exhaust by monoethanolamine (MEA) can be reduced 40-55%. For a near-term MEA plant designed as an add-on to existing power plant, the capital cost can be reduced by 40% through alternate equipment selections such as using plate and frame (P&F) instead of shell and tube (S&T) exchangers, elimination of the flue gas cooler, using ANSI instead of API pumps, using structured instead of random packing, and by combining two 50% trains into one 100% train CO2 compression. An ejector-assisted hot lean amine-flashing drum is added to reduce reboiling steam requirement by about 15%. All of the proposed changes are commercially demonstrated either for amine services or for other similar applications, and thus considered to have minimum risks.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.