Affordable Access

All---hazards preparedness in an era of bioterrorism funding.

Publication Date
  • Chemistry


Objectives: All-hazards preparedness was evaluated in North Carolina's 85 local health departments (LHDs). Methods: In regional meetings, data were collected from LHD teams from North Carolina's LHDs using an instrument constructed from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's preparedness indicators and from the Local Public Health Preparedness and Response Capacity Inventory. Results and Conclusions: Levels of preparedness differ widely by disaster types. LHDs reported higher levels of preparedness for natural disasters, outbreaks, and bioterrorist events than for chemical, radiation, or mass trauma disasters. LHDs face challenges to achieving all-hazards preparedness since preparation for one type of disaster does not lead to preparedness for all types of disasters. LHDs in this survey were more prepared for disasters for which they were funded (bioterrorism) and for events they faced regularly (natural disasters, outbreaks) than they were for other types of disasters.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

All-hazards preparedness in an era of bioterrorism...

on Journal of public health manag... 2007

The impact of federal funding on local bioterroris...

on Journal of public health manag... 2004

Pandemic and all-hazards preparedness act.

on Disaster medicine and public h... July 2007

The impact of federal bioterrorism funding program...

on Evaluation & the health profes... June 2009
More articles like this..