Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Implementation of screening tools and brief intervention by health professionals trained by a distance learning course

Authors
Journal
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
1940-0632
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Volume
7
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/1940-0640-7-s1-a86
Keywords
  • Meeting Abstract
Disciplines
  • Education

Abstract

Implementation of screening tools and brief intervention by health professionals trained by a distance learning course MEETING ABSTRACT Open Access Implementation of screening tools and brief intervention by health professionals trained by a distance learning course Maria Lucia O Souza-Formigoni1*, Ana Paula L Carneiro2, Eroy A Silva1, Paulina CAV Duarte3 From International Network on Brief Interventions for Alcohol and Other Drugs (INEBRIA) Meeting 2011 Boston, MA, USA. 21-23 September 2011 There is evidence for the effectiveness of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for risky alcohol and other drug use when administered by trained health professionals. However, there have been no controlled studies on the implementation of BI techniques when health profes- sionals were trained by a distance learning (DL) process. In this study, we evaluated the use of SBI by health pro- fessionals trained by DL. All participants were invited by email and regular mail to participate in the project. Those who agreed to participate received, by email, a questionnaire about their use of SBI, including questions on the difficulties associated with implementing SBI, screening tools used (e.g., the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT] or the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test [ASSIST]), and whether or not they conducted BIs. All participants answered a similar questionnaire immediately after the end of the course. Considering both questionnaires, only a few participants had problems conducting BI due to lack of support from their work team. Of the 94% of par- ticipants who intended to implement BI in their work, 74% did. After the course, most of the participants approached patients to assess their alcohol (72%) or drug (66%) use and out of those, 64.5% applied the AUDIT and 57.5% applied the ASSIST. Most participants (71%) also felt able to perform BI and to develop strategies to reduce substance use (84%); of these, 83% and 80%, respectively, did it. These re

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Impact of distance-learning training on substance...

on Addiction Science & Clinical P... Jan 01, 2012

Evaluation of the use of a screening tool by commu...

on Addiction Science & Clinical P... Jan 01, 2013

Implementation of brief intervention for alcohol b...

on Addiction Science & Clinical P... Jan 01, 2013

Virtual standardized patients for training health...

on Studies in health technology a... 2008
More articles like this..