Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Differentiating quality improvement from research

Authors
Journal
Applied Nursing Research
0897-1897
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
16
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1053/apnr.2003.59000

Abstract

Abstract Monitoring of quality of care has always been an important part of health care. Self-regulation and external standards require care providers to furnish safe environments for the patient. Similarities in methods used by quality improvement (QI) projects and clinical research have created some confusion in differentiating the two practices. This article reviews the current literature and differences between QI and research. In addition, the article identifies and discusses four criteria: intervention, risk, audience, and data source, which allow investigators to differentiate between the two practices and follow the appropriate procedures for project review. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Differentiating quality improvement from research.

on Applied Nursing Research February 2003

Differentiating quality improvement and research a...

on Clinical nurse specialist CNS 2013

The slippery slope: differentiating between qualit...

on JONA The Journal of Nursing Ad... April 2006

Quality improvement or research? A report from the...

on American journal of critical c... March 2008
More articles like this..