Affordable Access

Publisher Website

How valid is a self reported 12 month sports injury history?

Authors
Journal
British Journal of Sports Medicine
0306-3674
Publisher
BMJ
Publication Date
Volume
37
Issue
6
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.37.6.545
Keywords
  • Short Report
Disciplines
  • Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy of a 12 month injury history recall in a population of 70 community level Australian football players. Methods: The retrospective, self reported injury histories of 70 community level Australian football players were compared with prospective injury surveillance records for the same 12 month period. The accuracy of the players' recall of the number of injuries, injured body regions, and injury diagnosis was assessed. Results: Recall accuracy declined as the level of detail requested increased. All players could recall whether or not they were injured during the previous year. Almost 80% were able to accurately recall the number of injuries and body regions injured, but not the diagnoses, whereas only 61% were able to record the exact number, body region, and diagnosis of each injury sustained. Discussion: The findings of this study highlight the difficulty of using retrospectively collected injury data for research purposes. Any injury research relying on self reported injury history data to establish the relation between injury history and injury risk should consider the validity of the self report injury histories.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.