Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Is single observer identification of wound infection a reliable endpoint?

Authors
Journal
Journal of Emergency Medicine
0736-4679
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
23
Issue
4
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00564-4
Keywords
  • Original Contribution

Abstract

Abstract The majority of wound studies over the past 20 years have relied on single observer determination of infection presence or absence as a study endpoint. Nevertheless, there are few data on the reliability of those determinations. If single observer determinations are not reliable, the validity of studies using this endpoint should be questioned. Two physicians independently evaluated wounds for presence or absence of the primary endpoint of infection and the secondary endpoints of purulence, tenderness, warmth, and erythema. Kappa values were calculated as measures of inter-observer agreement, which was used as a measure of reliability. Of 125 patients enrolled, 115 wounds were available for analysis. Kappa =.57 [95%CI.39 to .75] for the primary endpoint of infection, .84 for purulence, .72 for tenderness, .48 for warmth, and .48 for erythema. Agreement on two features of infection and overall agreement on the presence or absence of wound infection was only ‘moderate.’ Single observer determination of wound infection by inexperienced observers using imprecise definitions, though commonly used, is an unreliable measure for scientific study.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Is single observer identification of wound infecti...

on The Journal of emergency medic... November 2002

Single-stage management of sternal wound infection...

on Journal of Thoracic and Cardio... February 1990
More articles like this..