Affordable Access

Comparison of phalangeal bone mineral content and density between the dominant and non-dominant sides

Authors
Publisher
The Sri Lanka Medical Association
Publication Date
Keywords
  • Anatomy
  • Accudxa
  • Handedness
  • Phalangeal Bone Mineral Density

Abstract

Objectives Compared to the non-dominant side, higher bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) have been demonstrated in the forearm bones in the dominant side. Clinicians are compelled to scan the dominant side when deformities or artifacts are found in the non-dominant side. This study was done to evaluate the differences in phalangeal BMC and BMD, measured using accuDXA, between the dominant and non-dominant hands. Design and participants A group of 333 subjects, comprising 267 healthy volunteers (185 women and 82 men) and 66 women with rheumatoid arthritis. Phalangeal BMD and BMC, were measured using accuDEXA, both in the non-dominant and dominant hands. Main results BMC and BMD showed strong correlations between the two sides (r = 0.95, p < 0.001 for both). Compared to the non-dominant side, dominant side BMC was 5% higher (mean values =1.54 and 1.47, mean difference = 0.064, 95% CI for the mean difference = 0.048-0.081g, p < 0.001) and BMD was 4% higher (mean values = 0.480 and 0.463, mean difference = 0.018, 95% CI for the mean difference = 0.014-0.021 g/cm2, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, percentage differences of BMD between the two sides were found to be similar among men (n = 82), women (n = 251), people below 50 years (n = 24), people above 50 years (n = 122) and also among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 66). Conclusions When the non-dominant hand is not suitable for scanning, the clinician should consider scanning the dominant hand instead. However, the differences in BMD between the two hands should be taken into consideration when interpreting results. Key words: accuDXA; handedness; phalangeal bone mineral density DOI: 10.4038/cmj.v50i4.1404 Ceylon Medical Journal Vol.50(4) 2005: 139-141

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Comparison of phalangeal bone mineral content and...

on The Ceylon medical journal December 2005

Evaluation of forearm bone mineral density: compar...

on Journal of the Medical Associa... February 2001

Comparison of the femoral neck bone density, quant...

on European Journal of Radiology November 2006

Comparison of the femoral neck bone density, quant...

on European Journal of Radiology Jan 01, 2006
More articles like this..