Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Parental duties and untreatable genetic conditions

Authors
Journal
Journal of Medical Ethics
0306-6800
Publisher
BMJ
Publication Date
Volume
26
Issue
5
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.5.400
Keywords
  • Article

Abstract

This paper considers parental duties of beneficence and non-maleficence to use prenatal genetic testing for non-treatable conditions. It is proposed that this can be a duty only if the testing is essential to protect the interests of the child ie only if there is a risk of the child being born to a life worse than non-existence. It is argued here that non-existence can be rationally preferred to a severely impaired life. Uncontrollable pain and a lack of any opportunity to develop a continuous self are considered to be sufficient criteria for such preference. When parents are at risk of having a child whose life would be worse than non-existence, the parents have a duty to use prenatal testing and a duty to terminate an affected pregnancy. Further, such duty does not apply to any conditions where the resulting life can be considered better than non-existence. Key Words: Prenatal testing • parental duties • beneficence • non-maleficence

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Parental duties and untreatable genetic conditions...

on Journal of medical ethics October 2000

IRB duties and genetic testing.

on Human research report January 2001

[Therapy in neurology. Part 9: Therapy of causally...

on Fortschritte der Medizin Aug 27, 1981

[Duties and work conditions of communal nurses in...

on Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fo... Jul 15, 1956
More articles like this..