Affordable Access

Why do additional presentations help us identify a stimulus?

  • Bf Psychology


Nosofsky (1983) reported that additional stimulus presentations within a trial increase discriminability in absolute identification, suggesting that each presentation creates an independent stimulus representation, but it remains unclear whether exposure duration or the formation of independent representations improves discrimination in such conditions. Experiment 1 replicated Nosofsky’s result. Experiments 2 (masking the ISI between two presentations) and 3 (manipulating stimulus duration without changing number of presentations or overall trial duration) ruled out an explanation in terms of extended opportunities for stimulus sampling, from either a sensory buffer during additional ISIs or increased stimulus exposure, respectively. Experiment 4 (comparing two and three presentations, other factors controlled) provided some limited additional support for Nosofsky’s original claim that additional stimulus presentations can create either independent or duplicate representations. Experiments 5 and 6 (both manipulating ISI) demonstrated that a key factor in the additional stimulus presentation effect is the overall trial duration. We discuss the results in relation to models of absolute identification, their relative emphasis on stimulus sampling versus response selection, and the mechanisms by which duplicate representations could be created.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

Why additional presentations help identify a stimu...

on Journal of experimental psycho... December 2010

Why do they hate us?

on Family process 2002

Help us do this job.

on Pennsylvania medicine April 1997
More articles like this..