Affordable Access

Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis sensu lato receive taxonomically valid names?

Authors
Journal
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
0074-0276
Publisher
SciELO
Publication Date
Disciplines
  • Biology
  • Chemistry
  • Medicine

Abstract

A group of 18 research workers involved in different aspects of the biology of Lutzomyia longipalpis discussed whether or not it is important to give taxonomically valid names to populations that have been defined by biological, biochemical and molecular methods to be reproductively isolated. The type material of this medically important species has been lost and because of this it was recommended that a colony should be established from insects captured in the region of the type area and that their description should serve as the basis for future descriptions. It was pointed out that there is a lack of uniformity in the naming of closely related American sand flies and that some of the differences between populations of Lu. longipalpis are greater than those between accepted species. The majority of the participants agreed that the populations that have been defined in the literature as sibling species should be named.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Should reproductively isolated populations of Lutz...

on Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo... December 2009

Occurrence of sibling species of Lutzomyia longipa...

on American Journal of Tropical M... December 1999

Sex pheromone and period gene characterization of...

on Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo... November 2010

Variation between geographical populations of Lutz...

on Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo... 1996
More articles like this..