Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Fifty Years of Study of S-P-A Systems: Past Limitations and a Future Direction

Authors
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Volume
19
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.003
Keywords
  • Robust Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Models
  • Philosophy Of Science
  • Disciplinary Science Barriers
  • Presicsion Agricultural Landscape Modelling System
Disciplines
  • Philosophy

Abstract

Abstract Prognostic Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (S-P-A) system models should be made as robust as possible; that is, parameters should be independent of variables and constant during applications with similar initial conditions (no calibration). However, avoiding calibration requires more cooperation among neighboring disciplines with a commensurate increase in time and effort for development. An example is provided to illustrate the unfortunate consequences of inadequate cooperation among disciplines. Perhaps institutional disciplinary structures are becoming too overbearing, so that scientists are constantly tempted to take shortcuts that make cooperation with colleagues in different disciplines more unlikely. If practitioner scientists would rekindle a close relationship with philosophers of science, who study the actual conduct of science, a more realistic perspective might evolve to reduce institutional structural impediments and connect scientists more closely to the larger community that needs and supports them. Certainly persistence would be required to begin and sustain such a process of change.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.