Affordable Access

Network Neutrality

  • Economics
  • Law


Much of the advocacy of legislatively-mandated network neutrality is based on a simple fallacy, namely, that differing charges to suppliers of content to the Internet for correspondingly differing speeds of delivery are inherently discriminatory. They are not; and an attempt to prohibit them would prevent the Internet's offering a full range of services, with widely diverging tolerances for latency. Preservation of the open end-to-end character of the Internet may well, however, require vigilant prohibition of vertical squeezes and other unfair methods of competition and authority of an antitrust agency to compel interconnections.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.