Affordable Access

Publisher Website

The pharmacological profile of the thromboxane A2 antagonist BM 13.177. A new anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic drug

Thrombosis Research
Publication Date
DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(84)90230-5
  • Thromboxane Antagonist
  • Antithrombosis
  • Antiplatelet Drug
  • Bm 13.177
  • Pharmacology
  • Medicine
  • Pharmacology


Abstract BM 13.177 (4-[2-(benzenesulfonamido)-ethyl]-phenoxyacetic acid) is a representative of a new class of sulfonamidophenylcarboxylic acids which possess platelet-inhibitory and anti-thrombotic activity and inhibits the contraction of rabbit aorta stimulated by PG endoperoxides and TXA 2. BM 13.177 S mg/kg body weight p.o. protected rabbits from arachidonate-induced sudden death and ≥ 10 mg/kg dose-dependently reduced the experimental thrombus formation induced in the rabbit aorta by perivascular administration of silver nitrate. In guinea-pigs, the collagen-induced bronchoconstriction was inhibited in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. The formation of TXA 2 and the TXA 2-induced platelet aggregation and smooth muscle contraction are probably crucial events in these experimental models. The protective effect of BM 13.177 may, therefore, be due to the TXA 2-antagonizing effect of BM 13.177, which has been conclusively demonstrated in human platelets (PATSCHEKE and STEGMEIER, Thrombosis Res., 33, 277–288 (1984).The antagonism of TXA 2 is supported by the observation that BM 13.177 also specifically inhibits the contraction of isolated arterial strips from rabbits which were stimulated with the thromboxane A2 mimetic U 46619. Schild-plot with a slope close to unity suggests a competitive type of antagonism. BM 13.177 exhibited neither anti-inflammatory nor ulcer-inducing activity of cyclooxygenase inhibitors. Furthermore it did not block the TXB 2 formation in spontaneously clotting blood from rabbits and did not inhibit the release of prostacyclin-like activity from rabbit aortas. The lack of toxicological effects in long-term toxicity studies in rat and dog, together with the absence of objective and subjective side effects in the first human studies have encouraged us to initiate clinical trials in order to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of this new approach in humans.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.