Affordable Access

A comparison of mass spectrometry based hydrogen deuterium exchange methods for probing the cyclophilin A cyclosporin complex

Authors
Journal
Journal of Chromatography A
0021-9673
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Keywords
  • Hdx
  • Cyclosporin
  • Cyclophilin A
  • Plimstex
  • Suprex
  • Gas Phase Hdx
  • Electrosprayed Ubiquitin Ions
  • Protein-Ligand Interactions
  • H/D Exchange
  • Thermodynamic Analysis
  • Gas-Phase
  • Structural Transitions
  • Conformational-Changes
  • Crystal Complex
  • A-Cyclophilin
  • Binding
Disciplines
  • Biology
  • Medicine

Abstract

Direct infusion electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (DI-ESI-MS) techniques provide an increasingly popular route to determine quantitative information on protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions. When combined with hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX), details on protein stability and complex conformation can be obtained: however, complexes retained by ESI-MS are not always representative of those in solution and care must be taken in interpreting gas phase results. Zhu et al [1] and Powell and Fitzgerald [2] have outlined LC-MS based techniques to probe the solution phase propel ties of the protein-ligand system in question We here have taken the well characterised soluble immunophilin protein cyclophilin A. and examined it in complex with its endogenous ligand cyclosporin A. This ligand is widely used as an immunosuppressant following organ transplant, and the complex provides a basis for drug discovery efforts. We have used direct infusion, coupled with HDX. gas phase HDX and also the LC-HDX techniques PLIMSTEX and SUPREX Results from each of these four HDX methodologies are presented here and discussed critically. From our direct infusion we find that there are 2 observable hydrogen populations in the protein, a very fast exchanging population, and a slower group. The exchange rate of both is lowered in the presence of the ligand. For PLIMSTEX we find a K(d) for ligand binding of 321 +/- 128 nM, which is within one order of magnitude of values previously reported. SUPREX under a variety of conditions provides a range of K(d) values, but when we average these for experimental error we obtain a K(d) of 7.11 +/- 029 nM which agrees well with measurements from other studies including via SUPREX. Finally gas phase HDX of the native complex shows more than 3 distinct populations of exchangeable hydrogens. for both the apo- and the holo protein consistent with an unfolding and refolding of the protein in the gas phase The different techniques are compared with respect to the advantages and disadvantages they bring to the study of this protein-ligand system (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.