Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Measuring the stringency of states' indoor tanning regulations: Instrument development and outcomes

Authors
Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
0190-9622
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
56
Issue
5
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.12.013
Disciplines
  • Law

Abstract

Objectives We sought to describe the development of an instrument to quantify the stringency of state indoor tanning legislation in the United States, and the instrument's psychometric properties. The instrument was then used to rate the stringency of state laws. Methods A 35-item instrument was developed. An overall stringency measure and 9 stringency subscales were developed, including one measuring minors' access to indoor tanning. Stringency measures showed good internal consistency and interrater reliability. Results In all, 55% of the 50 states and the District of Columbia had any indoor tanning law, and 41% had any law addressing minors' access. Oregon, Illinois, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, and Rhode Island had high overall stringency scores, and Texas and New Hampshire were the most restrictive with regard to minors' access. Limitations Measurement of actual enforcement of the laws was not included in this study. Conclusions The instrument appears to be an easy-to-use, reliable, and valid methodology. Application of the instrument to actual laws showed that, in general, state laws are relatively weak, although there was considerable variability by state.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Measuring the stringency of states' indoor tanning...

on Journal of the American Academ... May 2007

Measuring the stringency of states’ indoor tanning...

on Journal of the American Academ... May 01, 2007

Measuring nonsolar tanning behavior: indoor and su...

on Archives of Dermatology February 2008

Compliance with indoor tanning advertising regulat...

on British Journal of Dermatology April 2011
More articles like this..