Affordable Access

Publisher Website

The development of a 3D risk analysis method

Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publication Date
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.003
  • 3D Risk Analysis
  • Maximum Physical Effects
  • Iso-Surface
  • Cfd
  • Storage Tank
  • Lpg
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Mathematics
  • Physics


Abstract Much attention has been paid to the quantitative risk analysis (QRA) research in recent years due to more and more severe disasters that have happened in the process industries. Owing to its calculation complexity, very few software, such as SAFETI, can really make the risk presentation meet the practice requirements. However, the traditional risk presentation method, like the individual risk contour in SAFETI, is mainly based on the consequence analysis results of dispersion modeling, which usually assumes that the vapor cloud disperses over a constant ground roughness on a flat terrain with no obstructions and concentration fluctuations, which is quite different from the real situations of a chemical process plant. All these models usually over-predict the hazardous regions in order to maintain their conservativeness, which also increases the uncertainty of the simulation results. On the other hand, a more rigorous model such as the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model can resolve the previous limitations; however, it cannot resolve the complexity of risk calculations. In this research, a conceptual three-dimensional (3D) risk calculation method was proposed via the combination of results of a series of CFD simulations with some post-processing procedures to obtain the 3D individual risk iso-surfaces. It is believed that such technique will not only be limited to risk analysis at ground level, but also be extended into aerial, submarine, or space risk analyses in the near future.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times