Affordable Access

Nepotism, Discrimination, and the Persistence of Utility-Maximizing, Owner-Operated Firms: Comment



A recent thoughtful paper by Singell and Thornton (thereafter ST) in the Southern Economic Journal deviates in definitions, modeling, and a result from the traditional literature on tastes for discrimination and nepotism that originates with Becker and Arrow. This comment provides a critique of these three aspects of the ST analysis. In particular, it shows that ST’s astonishing result that discrimination will persist in a competitive labor market is unjustified, ST’s unconventional definitions of owners with unbiased and biased preferences are wrong, and ST’s unique modeling of discrimination and nepotism is unsupported.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times