Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Cytogenetical characterisation of Chinese hamster 43-3B transferants with the amplified or non-amplified human DNA repair geneERCC-1

Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
Publication Date
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90062-6
  • Cho 43-3B Transferants
  • Chromosome Aberrations
  • Dna Repair Gene
  • Human
  • Sce
  • Cell Killing
  • Induction
  • Biology


Abstract A comparative study on the biological responses to different mutagens (UV, 4NQO, MMC, MMS and EMS) was made on CHO wild-type cells (CHO-9), its UV-hypersensitive mutant 43-3B, and 2 types of its transferants, i.e., one containing a few copies of the human repair gene ERCC-1 and the other having more than 100 copies of ERCC-1 (due to gene amplification). Cell survival, chromosomal aberrations and SCEs were used as biological end-points. The spontaneous frequency of chromosomal aberrations in the transferants was less than found in 43-3B mutant cells, but still 2–3 times higher than in wild-type CHO cells. The spontaneous frequency of SCEs in the transferants was less than in 43-3B and similar to that of wild-type cells. The induction of SCEs by all tested agents in transferants was similar to that found in CHO-9 cells, while the mutant is known to respond with higher frequencies. ERCC-1 also bestowed resistance to MMS and EMS on the mutant to induction of chromosomal aberrations and cell killing to levels comparable with those of the wild-type strain. On the other hand ERCC-1 could not completely regain the repair proficiency against cell killing and induction of chromosomal aberrations by UV or MMC to the wild-type level. These results suggest that the ERCC-1 corrects the repair defect in CHO mutant cells, but it is unable to rectify fully the defect; probable reasons for this are discussed. However, amplified transferants (having more than 100 copies of the ERCC-1 gene) restored the impaired repair function in 43-3B to UV-, MMC- or 4NQO-induced DNA damage better than non-amplified transferants with a few copies of the ERCC-1. This difference may be due to the high amount of gene product involved in the excision repair process in the amplified cells.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.