Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Formoterol for maintenance and as-needed treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Authors
Journal
Respiratory Medicine
0954-6111
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
99
Issue
12
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.08.016
Keywords
  • Formoterol
  • Copd
  • Maintenance
  • As-Needed Reliever
Disciplines
  • Medicine

Abstract

Summary Formoterol is a long-acting β 2-agonist with a rapid onset of effect in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), making it potentially suitable for both maintenance and as-needed bronchodilator treatment. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of maintenance formoterol in patients with COPD and to compare the effects of additional formoterol as needed with terbutaline. In this 6-month, double-blind study, 657 patients with COPD (⩾40 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV 1] 40–70% predicted normal) were randomized to formoterol 9 μg twice daily (bid) plus terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed (FORM bid), formoterol 9 μg bid plus formoterol 4.5 μg as needed (FORM bid+prn), or placebo bid plus terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed (placebo), all administered via Turbuhaler ®. Primary efficacy variables were FEV 1 and the sum of breathlessness and chest tightness scores combined symptom score. Formoterol significantly ( P < 0.01 ) increased FEV 1 compared with placebo: FORM bid 6.5% (95% CI: 2.5, 10.7%); FORM bid+prn 11.8% (95% CI: 7.7, 16.2%). Combined symptom score decreased significantly in both formoterol groups compared with placebo: FORM bid −0.27 (95% CI: −0.49, −0.06; P = 0.012 ); FORM bid+prn −0.32 (95% CI: −0.53, −0.11; P = 0.0026 ). Similar significant ( P < 0.05 ) improvements were seen in both formoterol groups for morning peak expiratory flow, cough and sleep scores, and reliever use. In this study, formoterol 9 μg bid via Turbuhaler ® as maintenance therapy, with either formoterol or terbutaline as rescue medication, provided sustained improvements in lung function and COPD symptoms. Both formoterol regimens were well tolerated with no differences in adverse events or electrocardiogram profiles.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.