Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Implications of a biphasic two-compartment model of constant flow ventilation for the clinical setting

Authors
Journal
Journal of Critical Care
0883-9441
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
9
Issue
2
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/0883-9441(94)90022-1
Disciplines
  • Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the theoretical effects of changing frequency (ƒ), duty cycle (D), or end-inspiratory pause length on the distribution of ventilation and compartmental pressure in a heterogeneous, two compartment pulmonary model inflated by constant flow. Methods: Differential equations governing compartmental volume changes were derived and solved. Validation was conducted in a mechanical lung analogue with two mechanically independent compartments. Model predictions were then generated over wide ranges of ƒ, D, or end-inspiratory pause. Results: Disparity of compartmental end-expiratory pressure was identified as the primary mechanism by which changes in f, D, or pause alter the distribution of ventilation. Distribution of peak pressures was less sensitive to such changes. Compartmental ventilation was much less uniform than compartmental peak pressure. Ventilation could not be made entirely uniform by changes of f, D, or pause within the usual clinical range. Conclusions: In a linear, two compartment model of the respiratory system, disparity of compartmental end-expiratory pressures is the primary mechanism by which changes of ƒ, D, or pause alter the distribution of ventilation during inflation with constant flow. Ventilation is less evenly distributed than peak alveolar pressure, and there are limits to the beneficial effects on the distribution of ventilation to be gained from manipulations of machine settings.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.