Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Response to the preceding paper by Olkhovsky, Recami and Zaichenko

Authors
Journal
Solid State Communications
0038-1098
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
89
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(94)90413-8

Abstract

Abstract The authors of the preceding paper do not acknowledge that the choice for the arbitrary zero of time made by Olkhovsky and Recami (OR) is different from mine. My time parameter t is related to theirs by t = t OR + t 0 where t 0 is the finite length of time taken for the centroid of the incident wave function prepared at t = 0 (i.e., at t OR = − t 0 < 0) to propagate freely in the absence of a barrier to z = 0. Their major critisicm is consequently unjustified given my prescription for choosing the parameters of the initial ( t = 0) wave packet. Moreover, contrary to their claims. I did not cut off the initial gaussian wave packet at z = 0. For these and other reasons I see no need to alter my previous conclusions concerning the review article by Olkhovsky and Recami.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Appendix to the preceding Paper.

on Medico-chirurgical transaction... 1823

[Reply to preceding paper by Ernst Tetzner].

on Biochemische Zeitschrift March 1952

Response to Astor's paper.

on The Journal of analytical psyc... April 2007

Response to the white paper.

on The Journal of the Royal Colle... May 1989
More articles like this..