Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Laboratory diagnosis ofMycoplasma pneumoniaeinfection-D2

Authors
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012583806-1/50135-8
Disciplines
  • Biology
  • Medicine

Abstract

Publisher Summary This chapter reviews the current status and evaluation of the newer diagnostic methods for the measurement of a specific antibody in the infection. The discussion also covers the advantages of various antigen detection techniques in providing early diagnosis of infection. The problem in establishing a role for mycoplasmas in human sexually transmitted diseases has always been complicated by the commensal mycoplasma flora in the normal human urogenital tract. The development of effective tests has been hampered by two major constraints: (1) confirmation by culture of the organism is lengthy and difficult, and (2) serodiagnosis by the commonly used complement fixation test is slow. Serodiagnosis falls short of detecting all culture-positive patients. Thus, both culture and serodiagnosis are too slow to direct early clinical intervention. Despite the limitations, the routine laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasmapneumoniae infection often relies on serodiagnosis alone, principally by complement fixation or, more recently, on enzyme immuno assay (EIA) techniques or agglutination of antigen-coated particles. The chapter presents the three categories of tests in detail. These comprise direct detection of the organism by culture, detection of cellular components, and quantification of the non-specific and specific immunological responses of infected individuals.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

2D O(3) + 2D QG

Oct 04, 1993

2D or not 2D?

on Nature Chemistry September 2014

D2 or not D2?

on Alcoholism Clinical and Experi... August 1992

D2 to D2

Jun 12, 2008
More articles like this..