Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Doubting these doubts—A reply to Collet

Authors
Journal
Biological Psychology
0301-0511
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
28
Issue
2
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(89)90099-9

Abstract

Abstract In reply to Collet (1989) it is argued that principal component analysis (PCA) of event-related potentials is not invalidated or disproved by the arguments of his comment. The main points of this reply are as follows. First, since Collet's analysis was based on the correlation matrix only, it cannot disprove assumptions of PCA which do not constrain the correlation (or covariance) matrix. Second, his model utilizes results of PCA which invalidate the comparison and parameter count. Third, his model does not allow specific predictions and does not lead to real data reduction, which reverses Collet's argument based on the principle of parsimony. Fourth, his model is less general than PCA, as it could apply (if at all) to slow brain potentials only.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Doubting these doubts--a reply to Collet.

on Biological Psychology April 1989

On why Collet's doubts regarding the PCA are mispl...

on Biological Psychology Jan 01, 1989

Reply to Dr Stafrace. 'Doubts about HoNOS'.

on The Australian and New Zealand... August 2002
More articles like this..