Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Comparison of two dimensional and three dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy weekend less

Radiotherapy and Oncology
Publication Date
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.011
  • Chartwel
  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy
  • Two Dimensional Radiotherapy
  • Medicine


Abstract Background and purpose Patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer being treated with continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy weekend less (CHARTWEL) were planned and treated with a three dimensional (3D) conformal protocol and comparison made with two dimensional (2D) planning, as used previously, to compare past practice and methods. Patients and methods Twenty-four patients were planned initially using 3D and then replanned using a 2D system. The 2D plans were transferred onto the 3D system and recalculated. Dose volume histograms could then be constructed of planning target volumes for phases 1 and 2 (PTV 1 and 2, respectively), lung and spinal cord for the 2D plans and compared with the 3D plans. Results There was a significantly lower absolute dose to the isocentre with 2D compared to 3D planning with dose reductions of 3.9% for phase 1, 4.4% for phase 2 and 4.7% for those treated with a single phase. Maximum dose to spinal cord was greater in 17 of the 24 2D plans with a median dose reduction of 0.82 Gy for 3D ( P=0.04). The percentage volume of whole lung receiving ≥20 Gy ( V 20) was greater in 16 of the 24 2D plans with a median reduction in V 20 of 2.4% for 3D ( P=0.03). Conclusions A lower dose to tumour was obtained using 2D planning due to the method of dose calculation and spinal cord and lung doses were significantly higher.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.