Affordable Access

Publisher Website

The unsatisfactory margin in breast cancer surgery

Authors
Journal
The American Journal of Surgery
0002-9610
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
178
Issue
5
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00198-1
Disciplines
  • Biology
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background: Surgical margin involvement with breast cancer usually results in obligatory reexcision or mastectomy. While unalterable occult host and pathologic factors may interfere with margin clearance during the initial excision, it is possible that alterations in surgical technique might increase the likelihood of obtaining satisfactory margins. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-five patients who were candidates for breast conservation therapy were identified for 1991 and 1996 using the Tumor Registry. Margins were defined as “unsatisfactory” if there was microscopic involvement with tumor or the margin was close at initial excisional biopsy and the surgeon opted for reexcision. Multiple logistic regression analyses of factors associated with margin status were performed. Results: One hundred thirty-two (56%) patients had positive or close (unsatisfactory) margins; this rate increased from 51% in 1991 to 59% in 1996. Patients with unsatisfactory margins underwent more procedures (mean 2.0 versus 1.2; P <0.0001) than patients whose margins were satisfactory. The breast conservation rate for patients with unsatisfactory margins was 64% compared with 99% for patients with satisfactory margins. A multiple logistic regression demonstrated that patients with unsatisfactory margins were 67 times more likely to have a mastectomy than patients whose margins were satisfactory after adjusting for other significant factors ( P <0.0001). The practice of fine needle aspiration biopsy, orientation of specimen margins by the surgeon, and reexcision of tumor at the first operation were statistically significant technical factors in obtaining satisfactory margins. Significant pathology factors were extensive intraductal component (EIC), lobular or ductal extension, and tumor size. Conclusion: These data show that technical factors in the surgical management of breast cancer, as well as biological factors such as EIC, can influence the success of breast conservation.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

The unsatisfactory margin in breast cancer surgery...

on The American Journal of Surger... November 1999

What is a clear margin in breast conserving cancer...

on Current treatment options in o... March 2014

Conservative surgery in breast cancer. Significanc...

on Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) October 2001

Separate cavity margins excision as a complement t...

on European Journal of Surgical O... Jan 01, 2010
More articles like this..