Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Antibody avidity measurements in recipients ofCervarix®vaccine following a two-dose schedule or a three-dose schedule

Authors
Journal
Vaccine
0264-410X
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
32
Issue
26
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.005
Keywords
  • Human Papillomavirus
  • Vaccine
  • Antibodies
  • Avidity
  • Cervical Cancer
Disciplines
  • Biology

Abstract

Abstract The HPV-16/18 vaccine (Cervarix®) is a prophylactic vaccine for the prevention of cervical cancer and contains recombinant virus-like particles (VLPs) assembled from the L1 major capsid proteins of human papillomavirus (HPV) strains 16 and 18. Although a correlate of protection has yet to be identified, HPV-specific antibodies are thought to prevent virus infection of the genital mucosa. Therefore, antigen-specific antibodies as assessed by ELISA or pseudovirion-based neutralisation assay are frequently measured in clinical trials to substantiate the immune responses induced by the vaccine. Measuring antigen-antibody binding avidities, which reflects the degree of affinity maturation in the B-cells, is another valuable method to assess the quality of the antibody responses. Here we describe the antigen-specific antibody avidities in samples taken from a clinical trial examining the feasibility of adopting a two-dose (Months 0 and 6) schedule for 9–14 year olds instead of the three-dose schedule (Months 0, 1 and 6). Antibody avidity (i.e. avidity index [AI]) was determined in the ELISA by the ratio of antibody concentrations in serum samples treated or not with the chaotropic agent NaSCN. Importantly, in the comparison between the groups of two-dose and three-dose recipients, no differences in AIs were observed at Months 7, 24 and 48. The results suggest that from Month 7 to 48, the quality of the antibody response in terms of avidity was similar in the two-dose recipients to that in the three-dose recipients. Hence these results support the adoption of a two-dose schedule in 9–14 year-old girls.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.