Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?

Authors
Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
0895-4356
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
45
Issue
9
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9
Keywords
  • Patient Participation
  • Medical Oncology
  • Decision Making
  • Social Psychology
  • Neoplasms
  • Patient Advocacy
Disciplines
  • Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Two surveys were conducted to determine what roles people actually want to assume in selecting cancer treatments. 436 newly diagnosed cancer patients and 482 members of the general public participated. Preferences were elicited using two card sort procedures, each of which described five potential roles in decision making. Findings suggested that the impact of being diagnosed with a life-threatening illness may influence preferences to participate. The majority (59%) of patients wanted physicians to make treatment decisions on their behalf, but 64% of the public thought they would want to select their own treatment if they developed cancer. Most patients (51%) and members of the public (46%) wanted their physician and family to share responsibility for decision making if they were too ill to participate. Sociodemographic variables accounted for only 15% of variance in preferences. These variables are not particularly useful in making predictions about which groups want more or less active roles in medical decision making.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Decision making during serious illness: what role...

on Journal of Clinical Epidemiolo... September 1992

What role do patients wish to play in treatment de...

on Archives of internal medicine Jul 08, 1996

What do patients really want?

on Healthcare forum 1986
More articles like this..