Affordable Access

Deciding to believe again

Not yet know (probably Oxford University Press)
Publication Date


This paper defends direct activism – the view that it is possible to form beliefs in a causally direct way. In particular, it addresses the charge that direct activism entails voluntarism – the thesis that we can form beliefs at will. It distinguishes weak and strong varieties of voluntarism and argues that, while direct activism may entail the weak variety, it does not entail the strong one. The paper goes on to argue that strong voluntarism is non-contingently false, sketching a new argument for that conclusion. This argument does not tell against the weak form of voluntarism, however, and the final part of the paper argues that weak voluntarism, and consequently direct activism, remains a coherent and defensible position.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

[In what can we believe in again?].

on Revue médicale suisse Oct 12, 2005

To believe or not to believe.

on The Journal of the American Ac... October 1976


on California and western medicin... June 1931
More articles like this..