Affordable Access

Usporedba dinamičke analize para iznad otopine i mikroekstrakcije analita na čvrstoj fazi za plinskokromatografsko određivanje BTEX-a u urinu

Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
Publication Date
  • Gc-Ms
  • Pid
  • Ponovljivost
  • Pt
  • Spme
  • Točnost
  • Accuracy
  • Gc-Ms
  • Pid
  • Purge And Trap
  • Repeatability
  • Spme
  • Ecology
  • Geography


The aim of this study was to compare two extraction procedures: dynamic headspace-purge and trap (PT) and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) for gas chromatographic determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and isomeric xylenes (BTEX) in urine with photoionization (PID) and mass spectrometric (MS) detection, respectively. Both methods showed linearity in the range of interest [(50-2000) ng L-1], good accuracy (80% to 100 %), and repeatability (RSD≤11 %). Detection limits were in the low ng L-1 level for both methods, although slightly greater sensitivity was found for the PT method. In comparison with PT, HS-SPME was simpler and required less time for analysis. Although the analytical features of both examined methods are appropriate for biomonitoring of environmental exposure to BTEX, only the HS-SPME-GC-MS method is recommended for routine analysis of BTEX in urine. The method was applied for the quantitative analysis of BTEX in urine samples collected from non-smokers (n=10) and smokers (n=10).

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times