Affordable Access

Bad theory, wrong conclusions: M. Halle on Slavic accentuation

Authors
Publication Date
Keywords
  • Phonologie
  • Ddc:400

Abstract

Twenty years ago (1983), I severely criticized Halle and Kiparsky’s review (1981) of Garde’s history of Slavic accentuation (1976). I concluded that Halle and Ki-parsky’s theoretical framework “rests upon an unwarranted limitation of the available evidence, obscures the chronological perspective, and yields results which are partly not new and partly incorrect. It is harmful because it does not give the facts their proper due and thereby blocks the road to empirical study, giving a free hand to unrestrained speculation” (1983: 40). As Halle has recently returned to the subject (2001), it may be interesting to see if there has been some progress in his thinking over the last two decades. In the following I shall try to avoid repeating what I have said in my earlier discussion.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Balto-slavic accentuation : an update

on Histoire Épistémologie Langage Jan 01, 2004

Balto-slavic accentuation : an update

on Histoire Épistémologie Langage Jan 01, 2004
More articles like this..