Affordable Access

Publisher Website

On rules and rule-following: obeying rules blindly

Authors
Journal
Language & Communication
0271-5309
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
23
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/s0271-5309(02)00040-x
Keywords
  • Rules
  • Ethnomethodology
  • Connectionism
  • Wittgenstein
  • Emergentism

Abstract

Abstract The theoretical importance and explanatory value of ‘rules’ have frequently been questioned. This article discusses two different lines of criticism presented by the representatives of ethnomethodology and connectionism. It is argued that in both approaches a ‘rule’ is understood in a limited sense. Consequently their criticism does not give grounds to refute the notion of rules. The assumption that the later Wittgenstein proposes to reject ‘rules’ altogether can also be seen as mistaken. Wittgenstein attempts to dissolve the conceptual problems associated with the notion by considering it as praxis. His rule-considerations are compatible with an emergent approach to language, for they both reject rule-reification.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.